NORTH SPIRIT gender & spiritual with video

- Religion and Spiritual Maps -

Langdale Pike

Every Path has its Beauty, but every Path has its problems!

View of Langdale Pikes, Lake District, England – click image to see at full camera resolution.

There is no such thing as the perfect spiritual path, for indeed it is easy to lose our way with the old traditional paths.   We must become our own guide!   Do not let the Wisdom of Religions dazzle you, as a lot has become distorted from its original context and message.   So make your own Spiritual Map!

Be Kind - Be True,
Be Balanced - Be Curious

The Coming of Monotheism

For everyone to whom English is their native language, our spiritual heritage is Tyr, Odin/Woden, Thor, Freyja and the other aspects of God.   As in Tyr's day (Tuesday), Woden's day (Wednesday), Thor's day (Thursday) and Freyja's day (Friday)   ...Like the Spiritual Forces that seem to drive humankind described in mythical stories.   It is our heritage, but when Monotheism came to our ancestors, something profound began to be lost!   Our distant ancestors recognised many Spirit Forces, both male and female, yet they did not have any particular word for 'religion'. This was replaced by the one Male God of Christianity who now needed a 'Religion' of male Priests as go-betweens.   So while monotheism corrected some false thinking, this male view was the seed of many other problems.

However, there is only ONE Source, we could refer to it as The Great Spirit, or The Great Unknown, and speak in any language, but there are problems with the notion of Monotheism.

1. Firstly the word "Mono" - yes there is only one Source, but everything we can perceive of this Source reaches us through both Gendered Pairs, as well as multiple characteristics!   This is not just biology of life, but all of Thought Creations and consequent Physical Creations, including the Atom with its gender divided Linear and Rotary motions.   ALSO, everything we know about our world shows multiple characteristics – like; ordered, random, constructive, destructive.... So there are problems to the notion of 'Mono'.
(see my book Beyond Physics)

2. "Theism" - this sets up a doctrine and needs people to interpret the doctrine, which is the wrong way round to be learning. Rather we actually only grow spiritually from what we experience ourselves and reflect upon, not what we are taught by doctrine from the outside.

Heathen 'gods' — be careful what we mean...
...don't confuse Spirit Forces with 'The Source'

Like Currents within the Formation,
The Necessary Diversity for the Purpose of the Whole

Some of the 'Spirit Forces' are at a higher level concerning the evolution of Life and Humanity itself; all of which have characteristics of being both inseparable and distinct.   Monotheism made catastrophic mistakes, not in perceiving the Oneness of The Source, but in denying the Feminine side of The Source and the necessary diversity of Creation.   So only by looking from a higher plane, can we reconcile seeming opposites!

Every genuine Prophet that ever came, brought a message to replace something worse or cruel in a specific society.   ...Never did a Prophet ever speak to a 'blank canvas'!   So their messages were specific to the Land and culture of their revelation.   Human language is very limited in its ability to express deeper holistic truths, so we interject many distortions by trying to take a religious teaching from one Land to another, one culture to another.   Philosophical concepts might advantageously be shared with other nations, like ideas about Karma, Compassion, or Reincarnation; BUT not religious doctrine, which out of context would exclude or oppress.

Also, when Monotheism rejects the Reality of Gender Polarity as the means by which the Universe is Created - its 'modus operandi' - Monotheism then becomes male control by definition!

As Gender-Polarity is part of the Big Design; Monotheism only has any validity when this fact is clearly recognised!   ...With these inherent problems side by side with profound wisdom, it is curious to ponder what the actual inspirational source of monotheism was?   ...some say ET.

All perceptions of Divine or Spiritual beings are in-fact Avatars; a Front for something else which we have no words or shared concept to express. This ranges from our perception of personal Spirit-Guides, to Ascended Masters, to Spirit Forces, to Pagan gods and to 'God' apparently incarnated. All without exception are not what they appear, but it is wrong to call them false, as this is the only way most people can perceive the spiritual.   ...To quote from the start of my book 'Beyond Physics' –
"We cannot define the General in the Language of the Specific
...Speak in the Abstract, we must!

Nature Religions

In many cases it is wrong to call this Poly-theism, as it is a different way of looking at the Divine.   Like describing something by what it does, or by what it is – yet it is the same thing.   There is only One Source for the Universe, but many seeming conflicting forces, like a story or play...

Story Archetypes, after The Writers Journey by Christopher Vogler ...which itself was after The Hero's Journey by Joseph Campbell which included the ideas of Carl Jung.

Threshold Guardian

A Story or a Play that means something, says something, could not do it without having different actors, which can be generalised as archetypes.   I would suggest that the Spirit Forces we know as Odin, Freya, Thor, Loki etc. of the Sagas (stories), are archetypes of humanity. The Mythologies are all about how we understand ourselves amid all these 'Spirit Forces'.
    (personally, I find I have a lot of relationship with Odin/Woden, yet I also know Islam!) more

So defining ourselves by recognising ONE SOURCE, or defining ourselves by recognising a DIVINE PLAY of many Actors, is like describing something by what it does, or by what it is, yet it is essentially the same thing if both are true to their roots. — is it not just an example of the Polarity of everything manifested, and by comprehending the whole, we become more accurate in what we perceive.

In some ways the monotheistic religions have enlightened humanity, but in other ways their spread has done a lot of harm. Now is the time to climb above all this stuff and see the positives and negatives of all previous paths, and continue to make our own individual way towards our ultimate common destination.

Do you not think the early Christians also recognised spiritual connections to the Heathen ways?
...Between the opposites, we can reach to a higher plane.   It is inevitable therefore that there would have been a two-way intermingling of ideas, which later generations of religious people failed to comprehend!   ...Concepts about God and the stories were later interpreted as literal, not metaphorical of a higher plane!

Life's Circle

Spiritual Maps and Religion

Religions and Gurus offer us Spiritual Maps to help us navigate our path through life, and if we join them, we join a community of followers — but there is a problem to this...   We cannot find what we chase!   How can a person find enlightenment by following another?   How can we strengthen our goodness, unless we are challenged by the unexpected?

It is very different following an existing path up a mountain, to navigating our individual way back to The Source!   ...Returning home is what unifies, not the individual paths we travel.

We like to be part of community like a Religion, this is natural, but notice there are different ways a spiritual community can come together...

By the Law - such as Judaism.
By Mythology - such as the Norse gods.
By deep awareness of Nature's interconnected processes - Native American Tribes.
By a particular Philosophy - Common acceptance without the need for exclusion.

So Spiritual Maps do not have to be of a Religion, we can make our own map of how we perceive Reality, perhaps a hybrid of many concepts — and be part of a new community returning home.

Belief, Worship, Truth and Histories

Belief is a psychological state of mind, nothing to do with the facts.   It has more to do with what we learned first when we were little children.   Our position in the afterlife does not depend upon what we believe, but on how we behave while we're here!

Worship is basically pretence, what really matters is our: Gratitude, Kindness, Honesty, Fairness, Steadfastness and striving to improve.   Spirituality is not something separate to our daily life, it is what we are.

Truth, as they say in Law: "The Whole Truth and Nothing But the Truth", as partial truth is not acceptable because "Leaving things out is as big a distortion as putting things in!"
...Now Think Gender-Balance in Religion and Philosophy!

Histories: When people believe in different histories, which are actually only part truths, then they can then direct their energies in dangerous ways!   The Real Enemy is ignorance, and always has been.

The Real Enemy is Ignorance,
...we cannot fight that with guns!

Implausible Professions

To be a Prophet, a Seer, a Healer, a Dowser, or a Shaman; these are valid spiritual occupations that depend upon the gifts of the person concerned.   BUT to just lead people in organised religion is not the same.   The Spiritual cannot and should not be made separate or a separate profession, because this would introduce a corruption ...and when such religion-people make life changing decisions over common people, it gets really bad!   The Reality is; Spiritual is an aspect of everything in Life, not something separate, and should not be treated as such.

If a religion requires us to learn 'facts' or 'methods' or a 'book' before we can supposedly connect with their deity, it is a complete fabrication!   Unfortunately, this includes most of monotheistic faiths.   ...All Life-forms are permanently connected to that which created us, so we don't need priests or scholars to teach us what was born in us!

Balance is not enough...

Gear Wheel Balance Different people have different aims in life, that is obvious, but for the greater good there needs to be a balance of influence, with no one group (in their self-righteousness) hijacking the whole! It has to be a Balance of influence, but 'Balance' alone is not enough...
There also needs to be a Spiritual Vision of how Societies living on this Planet should ideally Live, which ultimately is our Purpose we are striving for.   This is where the independent Video Film is of so much help.   The Ancients used fireside stories to convey deeper aspirations, but this deeper purpose has been lost now in much of the commercial media, however independent amateurs can still be the modern day Shamans; showing a vision of a better Alter-Reality!
     ...which is Art as expression of deeper ideas. –  Volunteers needed to help with film-making

Barrier to the Spiritual Plane...

A helpful suggestion might be; in order to reach the Spiritual Plane, we need to be frequently moving up and down the ladder: Physical to Abstract-Mental with everything in between. But if we spend most of our time with our consciousness on the Abstract Mental Plane with Philosophy, we become like an Academic, unable to pass beyond a barrier to see the spiritual connectivity of all.

As the Physical Plane is the end result of all the other Planes, the Spiritual Plane is the reason behind all the others.   So we need to have ALL the lower Planes loaded in our immediate awareness before we can reach the Spiritual.

...So involve your hands in both mundane and skilled practical work, open your heart to other people close to you, debate intellectually with those who can, then spend time on your own within Nature.   Spiritual has passion to it, Academic Philosophy does not!   Spiritual is higher.

Many are the Spiritual Paths that present a Spiritual Map for us to follow, but ultimately we all have to make our own Spiritual Map, it is part of our spiritual progression.   But do we have to reject completely the orthodox religion we once followed?   ...or can we see it in a different way, that overcomes where the original true path became lost?

After Religion comes Philosophy of The Spirit else can the martyrs speak to us of where society is still going wrong?